You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1187512 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart H. M. Butchart, Matt Walpole, Ben Collen, Arco van Strien, Jörn P. W. Scharlemann, Rosamunde E. A. Almond, Jonathan E. M. Baillie, Bastian Bomhard, Claire Brown, John Bruno, Kent E. Carpenter, Geneviève M. Carr, Janice Chanson, Anna M. Chenery, Jorge Csirke, Nick C. Davidson, Frank Dentener, Matt Foster, Alessandro Galli, James N. Galloway, Piero Genovesi, Richard D. Gregory, Marc Hockings, Valerie Kapos, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Fiona Leverington, Jonathan Loh, Melodie A. McGeoch, Louise McRae, Anahit Minasyan, Monica Hernández Morcillo, Thomasina E. E. Oldfield, Daniel Pauly, Suhel Quader, Carmen Revenga, John R. Sauer, Benjamin Skolnik, Dian Spear, Damon Stanwell-Smith, Simon N. Stuart, Andy Symes, Megan Tierney, Tristan D. Tyrrell, Jean-Christophe Vié, Reg Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6,272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 62 | <1% |
| United States | 58 | <1% |
| Brazil | 46 | <1% |
| Germany | 25 | <1% |
| Canada | 25 | <1% |
| Spain | 16 | <1% |
| France | 15 | <1% |
| Italy | 13 | <1% |
| Mexico | 12 | <1% |
| Other | 140 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5860 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1137 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 1108 | 18% |
| Researcher | 1082 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 769 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 294 | 5% |
| Other | 992 | 16% |
| Unknown | 890 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2476 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 1778 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 194 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 143 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 134 | 2% |
| Other | 414 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1133 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#214,664
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#6,110
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#518
of 106,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#17
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.