↓ Skip to main content

Is There a Right to Hold a Delusion? Delusions as a Challenge for Human Rights Discussion

Overview of attention for article published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Is There a Right to Hold a Delusion? Delusions as a Challenge for Human Rights Discussion
Published in
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10677-012-9390-3
Authors

Mari Stenlund

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 21%
Psychology 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Mathematics 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#403
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,438
of 198,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.