↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of chronic inflammatory lesions of the colon for BMMF Rep antigen expression and CD68 macrophage interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of chronic inflammatory lesions of the colon for BMMF Rep antigen expression and CD68 macrophage interactions
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2021
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2025830118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 2 4%
Librarian 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 23 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2025.
All research outputs
#399,440
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,674
of 119,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,295
of 481,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#159
of 1,113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.