You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37657 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Callender, Mark Emberton, Stephen Morris, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Nora Pashayan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 32% |
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
| Scientists | 10 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 23% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 904. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#18,620
of 25,089,705 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#198
of 9,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#724
of 428,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#12
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,089,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.