You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response to Comments on “A Bacterium That Can Grow Using Arsenic Instead of Phosphorus”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1202098 |
| Authors |
Felisa Wolfe-Simon, Jodi Switzer Blum, Thomas R. Kulp, Gwyneth W. Gordon, Shelley E. Hoeft, Jennifer Pett-Ridge, John F. Stolz, Samuel M. Webb, Peter K. Weber, Paul C. W. Davies, Ariel D. Anbar, Ronald S. Oremland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Montenegro | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 145 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Professor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 46% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#295,018
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Science
#8,151
of 77,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#947
of 111,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#27
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.