| Title |
Primary Osseous Tumors of the Hindfoot: Why the Delay in Diagnosis and Should We Be Concerned?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2570-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter S. Young, Stuart W. Bell, Elaine M. MacDuff, Ashish Mahendra |
| Abstract |
Bony tumors of the foot account for approximately 3% of all osseous tumors. Diagnosis is frequently delayed as a result of lack of clinician familiarity and as a result of their rarity. The reasons for the delays, however, are unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,997,226
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,903
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,303
of 206,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#20
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.