| Title |
Mindlines: making sense of evidence in practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp16x686221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Gabbay, Andrée le May |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 26% |
| Spain | 8 | 12% |
| Norway | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Egypt | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
| Scientists | 13 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#884,132
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#386
of 4,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,160
of 380,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#11
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.