↓ Skip to main content

Galaxy Formation and Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
Title
Galaxy Formation and Evolution
Published in
Space Science Reviews, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11214-016-0270-3
Authors

Kentaro Nagamine, Naveen Reddy, Emanuele Daddi, Mark T. Sargent

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 378 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 32%
Student > Master 72 18%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Researcher 36 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 69 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 295 76%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 <1%
Mathematics 2 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 69 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,715,863
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#1,119
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,672
of 385,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.