↓ Skip to main content

Different expression levels of glycans on leukemic cells—a novel screening method with molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP) targeting sialic acid

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different expression levels of glycans on leukemic cells—a novel screening method with molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP) targeting sialic acid
Published in
Tumor Biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13277-016-5280-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zahra El-Schich, Mohammad Abdullah, Sudhirkumar Shinde, Nishtman Dizeyi, Anders Rosén, Börje Sellergren, Anette Gjörloff Wingren

Abstract

Sialic acid (SA) is normally expressed on the cell membranes and is located at the terminal position of the sugar chains. SA plays an important role for regulation of the innate immunity, function as markers of the cells and can be recognized by a variety of receptors. Interestingly, the level of SA expression is increased on metastatic cancer cells. The availability of specific antibodies against SA is limited and, therefore, biomarker tools for detection of SA are lacking. We have recently presented a novel method for specific fluorescence labeling of SA molecular imprinted polymers (MIP). Here, we have performed an extended screening of SA expression by using SA-MIP and included four different chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell lines, conveniently analyzed by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. SA expression was detected in four cell lines at different levels, and the SA expression were verified with lectin-FITC. These results show that SA-MIP can be used as a plastic antibody for detection of SA using both flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. We suggest that SA-MIP can be used for screening of different tumor cells of various stages, including CLL cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 20 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,811,816
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,220
of 2,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,665
of 365,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#35
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.