| Title |
Partitioning of soil water among canopy trees in a seasonally dry tropical forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, November 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004420050931 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. C. Meinzer, José Luis Andrade, Guillermo Goldstein, N. Michele Holbrook, Jaime Cavelier, S. Joseph Wright |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 269 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 26% |
| Researcher | 66 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 81 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 39 | 13% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,774
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,675
of 36,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.