↓ Skip to main content

「エンコーディング/デコーディング」論の理論的背景及び批判的潜在力の所在

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「エンコーディング/デコーディング」論の理論的背景及び批判的潜在力の所在
Published in
JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES, January 2006
DOI 10.24460/mscom.68.0_115
Authors

椎名 達人

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#16,588,625
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES
#73
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,412
of 174,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION STUDIES
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.