↓ Skip to main content

Laplacians and the Cheeger Inequality for Directed Graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Combinatorics, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
382 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Laplacians and the Cheeger Inequality for Directed Graphs
Published in
Annals of Combinatorics, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00026-005-0237-z
Authors

Fan Chung

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
Germany 3 1%
India 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 236 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 28%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 81 31%
Engineering 52 20%
Mathematics 47 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Physics and Astronomy 10 4%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 40 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,508,046
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Combinatorics
#2
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,175
of 59,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Combinatorics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them