↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of Complex Density-Dependent Dispersal Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of Complex Density-Dependent Dispersal Strategies
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11538-012-9770-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kalle Parvinen, Anne Seppänen, John D. Nagy

Abstract

The question of how dispersal behavior is adaptive and how it responds to changes in selection pressure is more relevant than ever, as anthropogenic habitat alteration and climate change accelerate around the world. In metapopulation models where local populations are large, and thus local population size is measured in densities, density-dependent dispersal is expected to evolve to a single-threshold strategy, in which individuals stay in patches with local population density smaller than a threshold value and move immediately away from patches with local population density larger than the threshold. Fragmentation tends to convert continuous populations into metapopulations and also to decrease local population sizes. Therefore we analyze a metapopulation model, where each patch can support only a relatively small local population and thus experience demographic stochasticity. We investigated the evolution of density-dependent dispersal, emigration and immigration, in two scenarios: adult and natal dispersal. We show that density-dependent emigration can also evolve to a nonmonotone, "triple-threshold" strategy. This interesting phenomenon results from an interplay between the direct and indirect benefits of dispersal and the costs of dispersal. We also found that, compared to juveniles, dispersing adults may benefit more from density-dependent vs. density-independent dispersal strategies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Researcher 11 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 53%
Environmental Science 7 16%
Mathematics 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,255,201
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#720
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,289
of 168,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.