↓ Skip to main content

Timing and causes of mid-Holocene mammoth extinction on St. Paul Island, Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
119 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
twitter
99 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing and causes of mid-Holocene mammoth extinction on St. Paul Island, Alaska
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1604903113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Russell W. Graham, Soumaya Belmecheri, Kyungcheol Choy, Brendan J. Culleton, Lauren J. Davies, Duane Froese, Peter D. Heintzman, Carrie Hritz, Joshua D. Kapp, Lee A. Newsom, Ruth Rawcliffe, Émilie Saulnier-Talbot, Beth Shapiro, Yue Wang, John W. Williams, Matthew J. Wooller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 234 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 26%
Researcher 44 18%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Other 13 5%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 24%
Environmental Science 47 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 40 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Arts and Humanities 13 5%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 45 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#13,681
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#429
of 103,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202
of 381,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 874 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 874 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.