↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for Crohn’s disease, integrated with formal consensus of experts in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for Crohn’s disease, integrated with formal consensus of experts in Japan
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00535-012-0673-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fumiaki Ueno, Toshiyuki Matsui, Takayuki Matsumoto, Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Mamoru Watanabe, Toshifumi Hibi, On Behalf of the Guidelines Project Group of the Research Group of Intractable Inflammatory Bowel Disease subsidized by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and the Guidelines Committee of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Crohn's disease is a disorder of unknown etiology and complicated pathogenesis. A substantial amount of evidence has accumulated recently and has been applied to clinical practice. The present guidelines were developed based on recent evidence and the formal consensus of experts relevant to this disease. Here we provide an overview of these guidelines, as follows. Target disease: Crohn's disease Users: Clinical practitioners in internal medicine, surgery, gastroenterology, and general practice Purpose: To provide appropriate clinical indicators to practitioners Scope of clinical indicators: Concept of Crohn's disease, epidemiology, classifications, diagnosis, treatment, follow up, and special situations Intervention: Diagnosis (interview, physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, imaging, and pathology) and treatment (lifestyle guidance, drug therapy, nutritional therapy, surgery, etc.) Outcome assessment: Attenuation of symptoms, induction and maintenance of remission, imaging findings, quality of life (QOL), prevention of complications and harm of therapy Methods for developing these guidelines: Described in the text Basis of recommendations: Integration of evidence level and consensus of experts Cost-benefit analysis: Not implemented Evaluation of effectiveness: Yet to be confirmed Status of guidelines: Updated version of the first Guidelines published in 2010 Publication sources: Printed publication available and electronic information in preparation Patient information: Not available Date of publication: October 2011 These guidelines were intended primarily to be used by practitioners in Japan, and the goal of these guidelines is to improve the outcomes of patients with Crohn's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 160 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,834,737
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#270
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,915
of 183,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.