↓ Skip to main content

Crucial conversations about weight management with healthcare providers: patients’ perspectives and experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Crucial conversations about weight management with healthcare providers: patients’ perspectives and experiences
Published in
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40519-016-0304-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Afton M. Koball, Paul S. Mueller, Julia Craner, Matthew M. Clark, Sanjeev Nanda, Esayas B. Kebede, Karen B. Grothe

Abstract

To elicit patient experiences of weight management discussions with providers and provide recommendations for future weight-related discussions. 1000 patients who recently saw their provider for non-weight specific appointments were mailed measures of demographics, self-reported height and weight, activity level, adherence, perceptions of and recommendations for weight-related discussions, and internalized weight bias. This study was primarily descriptive and utilized a mixed method design including collection of quantitative and qualitative data. 242 patients responded (24 % response rate); 32.4 % overweight (N = 72), 41.9 % obese (N = 93). 47 % of overweight and 71 % of obese patients recalled that their provider discussed weight; 92 % were motivated to follow recommendations and 89 % felt confident doing so. Most patients (75 %) would like their provider to be "very direct/straightforward" when discussing weight, and 52 % would be "not at all offended" if they were diagnosed as "overweight/obese." Most patients (63 %) reported being "extremely comfortable" discussing weight with providers. Patients with higher BMI had higher levels of internalized weight bias (p < .001) and wanted their provider to "discuss weight sensitively" (p < .05). This study suggests that patients have important preferences that providers should be mindful of when discussing weight. While these discussions can be challenging, most patients report that they would be comfortable having these conversations directly and most would have enhanced motivation and confidence following these conversations. Communicating about weight is needed and desired by patients; doing so sensitively with those at higher weight is essential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,516,978
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#784
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,027
of 371,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.