Title |
Plant diversity and regeneration in a disturbed isolated dry Afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12224-016-9247-y |
Authors |
Ermias Aynekulu, Raf Aerts, Manfred Denich, Aklilu Negussie, Ib Friis, Sebsebe Demissew, Hans Juergen Boehmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Lecturer | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 25 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,466,751
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#166
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,325
of 365,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.