↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Insights into Glycogen α‑Particle Formation

Overview of attention for article published in Biomacromolecules, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Insights into Glycogen α‑Particle Formation
Published in
Biomacromolecules, October 2012
DOI 10.1021/bm3012727
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitchell A. Sullivan, Mitchell J. O’Connor, Felipe Umana, Eugeni Roura, Kevin Jack, David I. Stapleton, Robert G. Gilbert

Abstract

Glycogen, a hyperbranched complex glucose polymer, is an intracellular glucose store that provides energy for cellular functions, with liver glycogen involved in blood-glucose regulation. Liver glycogen comprises complex α particles made up of smaller β particles. The recent discovery that these α particles are smaller and fewer in diabetic, compared with healthy, mice highlights the need to elucidate the nature of α-particle formation; this paper tests various possibilities for binding within α particles. Acid hydrolysis effects, examined using dynamic light scattering and size exclusion chromatography, showed that the binding is not simple α-(1→4) or α-(1→6) glycosidic linkages. There was no significant change in α particle size after the addition of various reagents, which disrupt disulfide, protein, and hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. The results are consistent with proteinaceous binding between β particles in α particles, with the inability of protease to break apart particles being attributed to steric hindrance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Chemistry 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,171,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Biomacromolecules
#4,027
of 4,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,426
of 172,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomacromolecules
#70
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.