You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2020-107020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Milne, Annie Sorbie, Mary Dixon-Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 35% |
| Austria | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,385,657
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1,312
of 3,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,708
of 432,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#39
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.