↓ Skip to main content

Staging and Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Staging and Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11920-012-0319-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Rodrigo Fries, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Laura Stertz, André Vinicius Contri Paz, Aroldo Ayub Dargél, Maurício Kunz, Flávio Kapczinski

Abstract

The apparently progressive nature of a considerable proportion of cases of bipolar disorder (BD) has been acknowledged in recently proposed clinical staging models. This has been part of an attempt to facilitate and refine diagnosis, treatment selection, and establish a prognosis. The study of the progressive nature of some cases of BD has given raise to the hypothesis of neuroprogression, which postulates that different stages of BD are associated with distinct neurobiological underpinnings. Given that BD may be intimately associated with chronic stress response and coping mechanisms over the course of illness, we propose that cellular resilience mechanisms may play a key role in the neuroprogression in BD. In the present study, we review neuroanatomical evidence of the progression that occurs in many cases of BD, as well as cellular resilience mechanisms and peripheral biomarkers associated with distinct stages of this disorder. In summary, cellular resilience mechanisms seem to be less efficient at later stages of BD, especially mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum-related responses to stress. These insights may help in developing staging models of BD, with a special emphasis on the search for biomarkers associated with illness progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 36%
Psychology 11 9%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,319,742
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1,037
of 1,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,092
of 183,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.