↓ Skip to main content

Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
675 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914
Published in
Physical Review Letters, August 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.117.061101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Misao Sasaki, Teruaki Suyama, Takahiro Tanaka, Shuichiro Yokoyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 80 73%
Mathematics 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#319,745
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#643
of 41,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,399
of 386,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#15
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.