| Title |
Characterizing a scientific elite (B): publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-012-0859-6 |
| Authors |
John N. Parker, Stefano Allesina, Christopher J. Lortie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 75 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Librarian | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 33% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,319,742
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,266
of 2,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,349
of 176,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.