↓ Skip to main content

Migrating Whooping Cranes avoid wind‐energy infrastructure when selecting stopover habitat

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Migrating Whooping Cranes avoid wind‐energy infrastructure when selecting stopover habitat
Published in
Ecological Applications, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/eap.2324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron T. Pearse, Kristine L. Metzger, David A. Brandt, Jill A. Shaffer, Mark T. Bidwell, Wade Harrell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 14 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#583,447
of 24,185,663 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#135
of 3,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,027
of 430,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#9
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,185,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.