| Title |
A Cross-Country Evaluation of Cheating in Academia—A Comparison of Data from the US and the Czech Republic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Academic Ethics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10805-013-9179-6 |
| Authors |
Marek Preiss, Helen A. Klein, Nancy M. Levenburg, Alena Nohavova |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 36% |
| Psychology | 2 | 18% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,627,937
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Academic Ethics
#12
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,962
of 284,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Academic Ethics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them