Title |
Sexual Inactivity During Young Adulthood Is More Common Among U.S. Millennials and iGen: Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Having No Sexual Partners After Age 18
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10508-016-0798-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean M. Twenge, Ryne A. Sherman, Brooke E. Wells |
Abstract |
Examining age, time period, and cohort/generational changes in sexual experience is key to better understanding sociocultural influences on sexuality and relationships. Americans born in the 1980s and 1990s (commonly known as Millennials and iGen) were more likely to report having no sexual partners as adults compared to GenX'ers born in the 1960s and 1970s in the General Social Survey, a nationally representative sample of American adults (N = 26,707). Among those aged 20-24, more than twice as many Millennials born in the 1990s (15 %) had no sexual partners since age 18 compared to GenX'ers born in the 1960s (6 %). Higher rates of sexual inactivity among Millennials and iGen also appeared in analyses using a generalized hierarchical linear modeling technique known as age-period-cohort analysis to control for age and time period effects among adults of all ages. Americans born early in the 20th century also showed elevated rates of adult sexual inactivity. The shift toward higher rates of sexual inactivity among Millennials and iGen'ers was more pronounced among women and absent among Black Americans and those with a college education. Contrary to popular media conceptions of a "hookup generation" more likely to engage in frequent casual sex, a higher percentage of Americans in recent cohorts, particularly Millennials and iGen'ers born in the 1990s, had no sexual partners after age 18. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 77 | 24% |
Canada | 13 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 3% |
Spain | 8 | 2% |
France | 4 | 1% |
Comoros | 4 | 1% |
Sri Lanka | 3 | <1% |
Indonesia | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Other | 30 | 9% |
Unknown | 169 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 288 | 89% |
Scientists | 18 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
Researcher | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
Other | 26 | 20% |
Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 27 | 21% |
Psychology | 27 | 21% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 22% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |