↓ Skip to main content

Breast-Feeding and Childhood-Onset Type 1 Diabetes A pooled analysis of individual participant data from 43 observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Care, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breast-Feeding and Childhood-Onset Type 1 Diabetes A pooled analysis of individual participant data from 43 observational studies
Published in
Diabetes Care, October 2012
DOI 10.2337/dc12-0438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris R. Cardwell, Lars C. Stene, Johnny Ludvigsson, Joachim Rosenbauer, Ondrej Cinek, Jannet Svensson, Francisco Perez-Bravo, Anjum Memon, Suely G. Gimeno, Emma J.K. Wadsworth, Elsa S. Strotmeyer, Michael J. Goldacre, Katja Radon, Lee-Ming Chuang, Roger C. Parslow, Amanda Chetwynd, Kyriaki Karavanaki, Girts Brigis, Paolo Pozzilli, Brone UrbonaitĖ, Edith Schober, Gabriele Devoti, Sandra Sipetic, Geir Joner, Constantin Ionescu-Tirgoviste, Carine E. de Beaufort, Kirsten Harrild, Victoria Benson, Erkki Savilahti, Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Mona Salem, Samira Rabiei, Chris C. Patterson

Abstract

To investigate if there is a reduced risk of type 1 diabetes in children breastfed or exclusively breastfed by performing a pooled analysis with adjustment for recognized confounders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#647,860
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Care
#761
of 10,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,517
of 193,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Care
#10
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.