↓ Skip to main content

One-year effects of two intensive inpatient treatments for severely obese children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
One-year effects of two intensive inpatient treatments for severely obese children and adolescents
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12887-016-0659-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Makkes, Carry M. Renders, Judith E. Bosmans, Olga H. van der Baan-Slootweg, Trynke Hoekstra, Jacob C. Seidell

Abstract

Intensive inpatient lifestyle treatment may be a suitable alternative for severely obese children and adolescents who do not benefit from ambulatory obesity treatment. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of two intensive one-year lifestyle treatments with varying inpatient periods for severely obese children and adolescents with regard to SDS-BMI and cardiometabolic risk factors. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with two active treatment groups. Eighty participants (8-19 years) with severe obesity received treatment at a specialized childhood obesity center in the Netherlands. Severe obesity was defined as a SDS-BMI ≥ 3.0 or a SDS-BMI ≥ 2.3 in combination with obesity-related comorbidity. Participants received an intensive one-year lifestyle treatment with an inpatient period of either two months and biweekly return visits during the next four months (short-stay group) or six months (long-stay group), both followed by six monthly return visits. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, six and 12 months and included SDS-BMI as primary outcome and cardiometabolic risk factors such as SDS-waist circumference, systolic- and diastolic blood pressure, and blood measurements as secondary outcomes. To evaluate differences in the course of the primary- and secondary outcomes over time between the two treatment groups, Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were performed. No differences in the course of SDS-BMI or secondary outcomes over time were found between the two treatment groups after one year of treatment. SDS-BMI decreased statistically significantly after one year of treatment compared with baseline in both groups (0.33 (0.48) in the short-stay and 0.52 (0.49) in the long-stay group). Similar results were found for SDS-waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure and HDL-cholesterol. Since there were no significant differences in effects between the short- and long-stay treatment and considering the burden of the long-stay treatment for children and families, we recommend implementation of the short-stay treatment. Netherlands Trial Register NTR1678 , registered 20-Feb-2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 39 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 41 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,425,391
of 24,653,581 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#733
of 3,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,054
of 375,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,653,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.