| Title |
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. A. Kanis, E. V. McCloskey, H. Johansson, C. Cooper, R. Rizzoli, J.-Y. Reginster, on behalf of the Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) |
| Abstract |
Guidance is provided in a European setting on the assessment and treatment of postmenopausal women at risk of fractures due to osteoporosis. The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2008. This manuscript updates these in a European setting. Systematic literature reviews. The following areas are reviewed: the role of bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk, general and pharmacological management of osteoporosis, monitoring of treatment, assessment of fracture risk, case finding strategies, investigation of patients and health economics of treatment. A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1201 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 185 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 177 | 14% |
| Researcher | 127 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 98 | 8% |
| Other | 271 | 22% |
| Unknown | 250 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 536 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 44 | 4% |
| Engineering | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 161 | 13% |
| Unknown | 315 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#945,774
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#110
of 3,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,450
of 196,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.