↓ Skip to main content

NRAS and BRAF Mutations in Cutaneous Melanoma and the Association with MC1R Genotype: Findings from Spanish and Austrian Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NRAS and BRAF Mutations in Cutaneous Melanoma and the Association with MC1R Genotype: Findings from Spanish and Austrian Populations
Published in
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, October 2012
DOI 10.1038/jid.2012.385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elke Hacker, Eduardo Nagore, Lorenzo Cerroni, Susan L. Woods, Nicholas K. Hayward, Brett Chapman, Grant W. Montgomery, H Peter Soyer, David C. Whiteman

Abstract

There is increasing epidemiologic and molecular evidence that cutaneous melanomas arise through multiple causal pathways. To further define the pathways to melanoma, we explored the relationship between germline and somatic mutations in a series of melanomas collected from 134 Spanish and 241 Austrian patients. Tumor samples were analyzed for melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) variants and mutations in the BRAF and NRAS genes. Detailed clinical data were systematically collected from patients. We found that NRAS-mutant melanomas were significantly more likely from older patients and BRAF-mutant melanomas were more frequent in melanomas from the trunk. We observed a nonsignificant association between germline MC1R status and somatic BRAF mutations in melanomas from trunk sites (odds ratio (OR) 1.8 (0.8-4.1), P=0.1), whereas we observed a significant inverse association between MC1R and BRAF for melanomas of the head and neck (OR 0.3 (0.1-0.8), P=0.02). This trend was observed in both the Spanish and Austrian populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#3,405
of 8,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,025
of 202,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#37
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.