↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Static magnets for reducing pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
40 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Static magnets for reducing pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2007
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.061344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max H Pittler, Elizabeth M Brown, Edzard Ernst

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 103 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#230,848
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#418
of 9,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327
of 84,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.