↓ Skip to main content

Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geodesy, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
460 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS
Published in
Journal of Geodesy, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00190-006-0093-1
Authors

L. Ciraolo, F. Azpilicueta, C. Brunini, A. Meza, S. M. Radicella

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 115 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 35%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 12 10%
Lecturer 4 3%
Professor 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 30%
Engineering 27 23%
Physics and Astronomy 15 13%
Mathematics 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#12,962,877
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#182
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,939
of 67,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.