You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An explicit cue improves creative analogical reasoning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
intelligence, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.intell.2012.08.005 |
| Authors |
Adam E. Green, Michael S. Cohen, Joseph U. Kim, Jeremy R. Gray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 64% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 90% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Design | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#592,174
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from intelligence
#135
of 1,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,196
of 202,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from intelligence
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.