↓ Skip to main content

[[[不完全性定理に挑む]に挑む]に挑む], ゲーデル(著), 林晋, 八杉満利子(解説、翻訳), ゲーデル 不完全性定理 / 田中一之(著), ゲーデルに挑む 証明不可能なことの証明 書評

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 144)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[[[不完全性定理に挑む]に挑む]に挑む], ゲーデル(著), 林晋, 八杉満利子(解説、翻訳), ゲーデル 不完全性定理 / 田中一之(著), ゲーデルに挑む 証明不可能なことの証明 書評
Published in
Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, January 2013
DOI 10.4288/kisoron.41.1_63
Authors

渕野 昌

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,877,682
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
#46
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,888
of 289,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them