| Title |
Osteochondritis Dissecans Knee Histology Studies Have Variable Findings and Theories of Etiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2619-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin G. Shea, John C. Jacobs, James L. Carey, Allen F. Anderson, Julia T. Oxford |
| Abstract |
Although many etiological theories have been proposed for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD), its etiology remains unclear. Histological analysis of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone tissues of OCD lesions can provide useful information about the cellular changes and progression of OCD. Previous research is predominantly comprised of retrospective clinical studies from which limited conclusions can be drawn. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,865,024
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,105
of 7,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,791
of 192,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#29
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.