↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of speech and evolution of language

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of speech and evolution of language
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1130-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bart de Boer

Abstract

Speech is the physical signal used to convey spoken language. Because of its physical nature, speech is both easier to compare with other species' behaviors and easier to study in the fossil record than other aspects of language. Here I argue that convergent fossil evidence indicates adaptations for complex vocalizations at least as early as the common ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans. Furthermore, I argue that it is unlikely that language evolved separately from speech, but rather that gesture, speech, and song coevolved to provide both a multimodal communication system and a musical system. Moreover, coevolution must also have played a role by allowing both cognitive and anatomical adaptations to language and speech to evolve in parallel. Although such a coevolutionary scenario is complex, it is entirely plausible from a biological point of view.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Professor 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 13%
Neuroscience 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Linguistics 11 9%
Arts and Humanities 11 9%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 34 28%