You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary flavonoid and lignan intake and gastric adenocarcinoma risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.112.037358 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raul Zamora-Ros, Antonio Agudo, Leila Luján-Barroso, Isabelle Romieu, Pietro Ferrari, Viktoria Knaze, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Max Leenders, Ruth C Travis, Carmen Navarro, Emilio Sánchez-Cantalejo, Nadia Slimani, Augustin Scalbert, Veronika Fedirko, Anette Hjartåker, Dagrun Engeset, Guri Skeie, Heiner Boeing, Jana Förster, Kuanrong Li, Birgit Teucher, Claudia Agnoli, Rosario Tumino, Amalia Mattiello, Calogero Saieva, Ingegerd Johansson, Roger Stenling, Maria Luisa Redondo, Peter Wallström, Ulrika Ericson, Kay-Tee Khaw, Angela A Mulligan, Antonia Trichopoulou, Vardis Dilis, Michael Katsoulis, Petra H M Peeters, Lazslo Igali, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjær, Marina Touillaud, Florence Perquier, Guy Fagherazzi, Pilar Amiano, Eva Ardanaz, Lea Bredsdorff, Kim Overvad, Fulvio Ricceri, Elio Riboli, Carlos A González |
| Abstract |
Several experimental studies have suggested potential anticarcinogenic effects of flavonoids, although epidemiologic evidence for the impact of dietary flavonoids on risk of gastric cancer (GC) is limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,399,681
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2,579
of 12,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,753
of 193,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#37
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.