↓ Skip to main content

The cognitive capabilities of farm animals: categorisation learning in dwarf goats (Capra hircus)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
The cognitive capabilities of farm animals: categorisation learning in dwarf goats (Capra hircus)
Published in
Animal Cognition, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0485-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susann Meyer, Gerd Nürnberg, Birger Puppe, Jan Langbein

Abstract

The ability to establish categories enables organisms to classify stimuli, objects and events by assessing perceptual, associative or rational similarities and provides the basis for higher cognitive processing. The cognitive capabilities of farm animals are receiving increasing attention in applied ethology, a development driven primarily by scientifically based efforts to improve animal welfare. The present study investigated the learning of perceptual categories in Nigerian dwarf goats (Capra hircus) by using an automated learning device installed in the animals' pen. Thirteen group-housed goats were trained in a closed-economy approach to discriminate artificial two-dimensional symbols presented in a four-choice design. The symbols belonged to two categories: category I, black symbols with an open centre (rewarded) and category II, the same symbols but filled black (unrewarded). One symbol from category I and three different symbols from category II were used to define a discrimination problem. After the training of eight problems, the animals were presented with a transfer series containing the training problems interspersed with completely new problems made from new symbols belonging to the same categories. The results clearly demonstrate that dwarf goats are able to form categories based on similarities in the visual appearance of artificial symbols and to generalise across new symbols. However, the goats had difficulties in discriminating specific symbols. It is probable that perceptual problems caused these difficulties. Nevertheless, the present study suggests that goats housed under farming conditions have well-developed cognitive abilities, including learning of open-ended categories. This result could prove beneficial by facilitating animals' adaptation to housing environments that favour their cognitive capabilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 46%
Psychology 9 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,067,289
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#580
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,100
of 160,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.