| Title |
The effect of urban and rural habitats and resource type on activity budgets of commensal rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Primates, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10329-012-0330-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Firoj Jaman, Michael A. Huffman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 17% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,466,751
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#900
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,817
of 170,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.