↓ Skip to main content

Ionic imbalance induced self-propulsion of liquid metals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ionic imbalance induced self-propulsion of liquid metals
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Zavabeti, Torben Daeneke, Adam F. Chrimes, Anthony P. O’Mullane, Jian Zhen Ou, Arnan Mitchell, Khashayar Khoshmanesh, Kourosh Kalantar-zadeh

Abstract

Components with self-propelling abilities are important building blocks of small autonomous systems and the characteristics of liquid metals are capable of fulfilling self-propulsion criteria. To date, there has been no exploration regarding the effect of electrolyte ionic content surrounding a liquid metal for symmetry breaking that generates motion. Here we show the controlled actuation of liquid metal droplets using only the ionic properties of the aqueous electrolyte. We demonstrate that pH or ionic concentration gradients across a liquid metal droplet induce both deformation and surface Marangoni flow. We show that the Lippmann dominated deformation results in maximum velocity for the self-propulsion of liquid metal droplets and illustrate several key applications, which take advantage of such electrolyte-induced motion. With this finding, it is possible to conceive the propulsion of small entities that are constructed and controlled entirely with fluids, progressing towards more advanced soft systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 29%
Chemical Engineering 12 11%
Chemistry 11 10%
Materials Science 9 8%
Physics and Astronomy 7 6%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#219,848
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#3,148
of 51,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,696
of 374,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#60
of 794 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 794 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.