↓ Skip to main content

One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Game Theory, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 160)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness
Published in
International Journal of Game Theory, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00182-009-0170-9
Authors

M. Remzi Sanver, William S. Zwicker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 27%
Mathematics 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,175
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#34
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,457
of 107,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them