| Title |
Growth, morphological traits and mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots respond differently to nitrogen addition in a slash pine plantation in subtropical China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-015-2420-x |
| Authors |
Liang Kou, Dali Guo, Hao Yang, Wenlong Gao, Shenggong Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,272,753
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#655
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,268
of 258,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.