| Title |
Plant growth and metal uptake by a non-hyperaccumulating species (Lolium perenne) and a Cd-Zn hyperaccumulator (Noccaea caerulescens) in contaminated soils amended with biochar
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-015-2384-x |
| Authors |
Frédéric Rees, Cyril Germain, Thibault Sterckeman, Jean-Louis Morel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 28% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#782
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,716
of 364,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.