| Title |
Enhanced biological N2 fixation and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in an acid soil following biochar addition: dissection of causal mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-015-2427-3 |
| Authors |
Lukas Van Zwieten, Terry Rose, David Herridge, Stephen Kimber, Josh Rust, Annette Cowie, Stephen Morris |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 55 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,009,134
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#829
of 3,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,991
of 278,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.