↓ Skip to main content

An Oral Sphingosine 1‑Phosphate Receptor 1 (S1P1) Antagonist Prodrug with Efficacy in Vivo: Discovery, Synthesis, and Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Oral Sphingosine 1‑Phosphate Receptor 1 (S1P1) Antagonist Prodrug with Efficacy in Vivo: Discovery, Synthesis, and Evaluation
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, October 2012
DOI 10.1021/jm3009508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Angst, Philipp Janser, Jean Quancard, Peter Buehlmayer, Frederic Berst, Lukas Oberer, Christian Beerli, Markus Streiff, Charles Pally, Rene Hersperger, Christian Bruns, Frederic Bassilana, Birgit Bollbuck

Abstract

A prodrug approach to optimize the oral exposure of a series of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) antagonists for chronic efficacy studies led to the discovery of (S)-2-{[3'-(4-chloro-2,5-dimethylphenylsulfonylamino)-3,5-dimethylbiphenyl-4-carbonyl]methylamino}-4-dimethylaminobutyric acid methyl ester 14. Methyl ester prodrug 14 is hydrolyzed in vivo to the corresponding carboxylic acid 15, a potent and selective S1P(1) antagonist. Oral administration of the prodrug 14 induces sustained peripheral blood lymphocyte reduction in rats. In a rat cardiac transplantation model coadministration of a nonefficacious dose of prodrug 14 with a nonefficacious dose of sotrastaurin (19), a protein kinase C inhibitor, or everolimus (20), an mTOR inhibitor, effectively prolonged the survival time of rat cardiac allografts. This demonstrates that clinically useful immunomodulation mediated by the S1P(1) receptor can be achieved with an S1P(1) antagonist generated in vivo after oral administration of its prodrug.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,319,742
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#21,143
of 22,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,953
of 183,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#145
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.