You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus diagnostic criteria for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia: a modified Delphi study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001918 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rochelle E Watkins, Elizabeth J Elliott, Raewyn C Mutch, Janet M Payne, Heather M Jones, Jane Latimer, Elizabeth Russell, James P Fitzpatrick, Lorian Hayes, Lucinda Burns, Jane Halliday, Heather A D'Antoine, Amanda Wilkins, Elizabeth Peadon, Sue Miers, Maureen Carter, Colleen M O'Leary, Anne McKenzie, Carol Bower |
| Abstract |
To evaluate health professionals' agreement with components of published diagnostic criteria for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) in order to guide the development of standard diagnostic guidelines for Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
| Psychology | 8 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2012.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#18,345
of 25,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,768
of 202,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#161
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.