↓ Skip to main content

Classification and histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular diagnosis of inflammatory myocardial disease

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Classification and histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular diagnosis of inflammatory myocardial disease
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10741-012-9355-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Basso, Fiorella Calabrese, Annalisa Angelini, Elisa Carturan, Gaetano Thiene

Abstract

In the WHO 1996 classification of cardiomyopathies, myocarditis is defined as an "inflammatory disease of the myocardium associated with cardiac dysfunction" and is listed among "specific cardiomyopathies". Myocarditis is diagnosed on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) by established histological, immunological, and immunohistochemical criteria, and molecular techniques are recommended to identify viral etiology. Infectious, autoimmune, and idiopathic forms of inflammatory cardiomyopathy are recognized that may lead to dilated cardiomyopathy. According to Dallas criteria, myocarditis is diagnosed in the setting of an "inflammatory infiltrate of the myocardium with necrosis and/or degeneration of adjacent myocytes, not typical of ischemic damage associated with coronary artery disease". The majority of experts in the field agree that an actual increase in sensitivity of EMB has now been reached by using immunohistochemistry together with histology. A value of >14 leukocytes/mm(2) with the presence of T lymphocytes >7 cells/mm(2) has been considered a realistic cut off to reach a diagnosis of myocarditis. The development of molecular biological techniques, particularly amplification methods like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or nested-PCR, allows the detection of low copy viral genomes even from an extremely small amount of tissue such as in EMB specimens. Positive PCR results obtained on EMB should always be accompanied by a parallel investigation on blood samples collected at the time of the EMB. According to the recent Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology guidelines, optimal specimen procurement and triage indicates at least three, preferably four, EMB fragments, each 1-2 mm in size, that should immediately be fixed in 10 % buffered formalin at room temperature for light microscopic examination. In expected focal myocardial lesions, additional sampling is recommended. Moreover, one or two specimens should be snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C or alternatively stored in RNA-later for possible molecular tests or specific stains. A sample of peripheral blood (5-10 ml) in EDTA or citrate from patients with suspected myocarditis allows molecular testing for the same viral genomes sought in the myocardial tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Unspecified 5 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,508,761
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#159
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,994
of 183,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.