↓ Skip to main content

Graphic imagery is not sufficient for increased attention to cigarette warnings: the role of text captions

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Graphic imagery is not sufficient for increased attention to cigarette warnings: the role of text captions
Published in
Addiction, November 2012
DOI 10.1111/add.12008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle G. Brown, John G. Reidy, Anna R. Weighall, Madelynne A. Arden

Abstract

The present study aims to assess the extent to which attention to UK cigarette warnings is attributable to the graphic nature of the content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 33%
Social Sciences 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,180,146
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Addiction
#5,004
of 6,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,398
of 286,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction
#63
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.