You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
変成岩から見た沈み込み帯の水―岩石相互作用
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Magazine of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2465/gkk.210108b |
| Authors |
吉田 健太 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 23% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,682,490
of 24,972,914 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Magazine of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences
#5
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,053
of 516,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Magazine of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,972,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.