↓ Skip to main content

病理解剖学にみた結核症

Overview of attention for article published in Iryo, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
病理解剖学にみた結核症
Published in
Iryo, October 2011
DOI 10.11261/iryo1946.26.139
Authors

古田 睦広, 尾崎 元昭, 原田 禹雄, 高橋 俊一郎, 村上 元正, 松本 繁雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,309,613
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Iryo
#5
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,351
of 152,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Iryo
#5
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.