You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparisons of amine solvents for post-combustion CO2 capture: A multi-objective analysis approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.06.020 |
| Authors |
Anita S. Lee, John C. Eslick, David C. Miller, John R. Kitchin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 27 | 24% |
| Engineering | 25 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 12% |
| Energy | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,312,846
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
#128
of 936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,264
of 219,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.